tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-200911102008-05-24T19:28:09.646-04:00Vote No on JOE (Knollenberg)With Liberty & Justice for all . . .noreply@blogger.comBlogger596125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-39982190199606081002008-05-24T17:48:00.002-04:002008-05-24T17:50:45.043-04:00Administering the Bush/McCain Challenge in Rochester at the Heritage Festival<span style="font-size:130%;">We had a great time talking to people at the Heritage Festival in Rochester. Most people already knew the only difference, McCain is older.<br /><br /></span><br /><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DdiKajV_RRw&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DdiKajV_RRw&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-75369981534864961912008-05-24T15:55:00.005-04:002008-05-24T19:28:09.771-04:00George Bush, John McBush and Joe NOllenberg at the Heritage Festival in Rochester<span style="font-size:130%;">Here's something I'd never do with the real McCain and Bush. But I think the T-shirt says it all.</span><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SDikPmf9TVI/AAAAAAAAAnM/vMZVMMqLzUQ/s1600-h/100_4456.JPG"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SDikPmf9TVI/AAAAAAAAAnM/vMZVMMqLzUQ/s400/100_4456.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5204089957366189394" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-size:130%;">Joe NOllenberg made a visit to the Heritage Festival in Rochester on Saturday. I think Joe feels America has had enough of his brand of Republican, as you can see from his t-shirt. Enough of George Bush, John McCain and Joe Knollenberg. Joe is pretty tight with George and John. Joe's voted with George W. Bush 94% of the time and most people couldn't tell the difference between George and John McBush when the took the Bush/McCain Challenge. My favorite question was who finished 894 out a class of 899 in college? Answer: John McCain. </span><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline;"></span><br /><div style="text-align: center;"><div style="text-align: center;"><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SDhzjGf9TTI/AAAAAAAAAm8/u6HMbPhXjn0/s1600-h/100_4457.JPG"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SDhzjGf9TTI/AAAAAAAAAm8/u6HMbPhXjn0/s400/100_4457.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5204036416303877426" border="0" /></a><span style="font-size:130%;">Mike Smith of Clawson joins Joe, John and George for a photo op.</span><br /></div><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SDh1RWf9TUI/AAAAAAAAAnE/7jrX4HqjWRs/s1600-h/100_4458.JPG"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SDh1RWf9TUI/AAAAAAAAAnE/7jrX4HqjWRs/s400/100_4458.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5204038310384454978" border="0" /></a></div>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-25749250060719694332008-05-22T10:18:00.003-04:002008-05-22T10:20:18.327-04:00Dave Woodward, Oakland County Democrat Chair, in Spinal Column on the Peters/Knollenberg race<span style="font-size:130%;">The May 21 edition of the Spinal Column contains a rather lengthy interview with Oakland County Democratic Party chair, Dave Woodward. Woodward had some specific comments about the Peters/Knollenberg race you may find interesting.<br /></span><span class="body"><blockquote> SCN: U.S. Rep. Joe Knollenberg has been targeted by the Democratic Party and is considered to be vulnerable this year, after barely beating his Democratic opponent in 2006. Tell us why you think Gary Peters can be successful in the general election.<br /><br />Woodward: Gary Peters understands first and foremost what's most important to the voters of Oakland County, and that's leadership that will help create jobs. Gary, in his own rite, has a huge amount of experience in serving his country in the Navy, serving his community while being everything from being a city councilman to being a state senator, completely within the district, to being an administrator when he worked as director of state lottery and generated record revenues for public education. (He has) all those things combined with broad leadership and values in sync with the priorities of this county, and he knows how to run a campaign. But most importantly he knows how to lead with his values and voters in Oakland County want change. They are sick and tired of the same old policies that have gotten our county and our nation in the situation that it is in. Joe Knollenberg has voted with President Bush almost 100 percent of the time and continues to embrace those failed policies. So voters have to ask themselves are they ready for change, are they ready for a new direction, are they ready for someone who's going to fight for job creation and to keep jobs from being outsourced overseas, investment in our young people in terms of early education and higher education, and protecting our environment.<br /><br />Joe Knollenberg has scored very low in all of those arenas. Voters will have that opportunity. I'm very confident things are going to change.<br /><br /> <br /><br />SCN: We don't nearly as often hear that U.S. Rep. Thaddeus McCotter is as vulnerable as Knollenberg, but his district has traditionally been a swing area. Please explain why you do or don't think the Democratic Party should shift some of its focus away from defeating Knollenberg and devote more toward knocking off McCotter.<br /><br />Woodward: I think it's a couple things. I think Knollenberg and McCotter are equally vulnerable. There's no question. I think, again, voters in general want a change. I think when you look at Joe Knollenberg's record, he is extremely out of touch, much more entrenched in Washington. Is he easier? I guess I don't know. I do expect significant resources will be spent in the 11th Congressional District, which Congressman McCotter represents. You have to remember this stuff isn't happening in a vacuum, that we're going to have a presidential campaign like Michigan has never seen before. Whomever that nominee is — and very likely, most likely it will be Sen. Barack Obama — you'll see an immense amount of resources spent to make sure we maximize the turnout of every single voter in Michigan, thereby including both congressional districts. I don't believe at some levels there are significant resources that take on incumbents, unfortunately. It's by flawed design that incumbents automatically walk out with huge leads in these kinds of races. You need candidates who can raise money. You have two democratic candidates who really are breaking records across the country in the amount of money they've been able to raise this early in the game. So that's why there's a lot of attention in the Knollenberg (district) but I wouldn't say that we're writing off the other races. I think we are going to have them and can pull off these elections come November. I think there will be a lot of surprises. There will be races that couldn't have of been won, but will be won because voters are frustrated with the direction George Bush has taken this country, and people want change.</blockquote></span>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-19084824850237666742008-05-22T06:40:00.002-04:002008-05-22T06:43:55.719-04:00Will Joe Knollenberg Call John McBush and Demand McBush Denounce Hagee?<span style="font-size:130%;">Some more inflammatory audio has turned up. Now Hagee is outright saying that God sent Hitler and that the Holocaust was a good thing because it forced the Jews to move to Israel. Being raised Jewish, I can't even begin to tell you how offensive I find Hagee's comments. These comments by Hagee and McBush's refusal so far to denounce Hagee is a story that the corporate media needs to bring to the fore. Joe Knollenberg has substantial support among the Jewish population in Oakland County. Will his Jewish support dwindle by his being affiliated with John McBush and McBush's refusal to disassociate himself from Hagee? <br />Here's the audio of Hagee's comments.<br /><br /></span><br /><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ErC1IJeHnyc&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ErC1IJeHnyc&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-78164147356165834722008-05-19T08:29:00.002-04:002008-05-19T08:33:03.289-04:00John McBush, Joe Knollenberg and the Republicans are the real Elitists<span style="font-size:130%;">I found this video today and it points out what a crock of hooey it is when John McBush refers to Barack Obama as an elitist. Obama just recently, with proceeds from his book paid off his student loans. On the other hand, John McBush dumped his first wife for a rich heiress and they own 8 homes across the country. Cindy McCain just divested her portfolio of investments in the Sudan. Apparently she thought that they might be a problem in the campaign and she refuses to ever release her tax returns. <br /><br />Joe Knollenberg is also wealthy from his prior involvement in his insurance business. Maybe that's why he is so opposed to universal, single-payer health care for all Americans. <br /></span><br /><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XjJGudkju0g&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XjJGudkju0g&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-20075713239091325982008-05-18T16:59:00.001-04:002008-05-18T17:02:09.540-04:00Joe Knollenberg and John McBush have a credibility problem<span style="font-size:130%;">This video points out why Joe Knollenberg and John McBush have a real problem with the American people when it comes to telling the truth.<br /><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GEtZlR3zp4c&color1=2b405b&color2=6b8ab6"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GEtZlR3zp4c&color1=2b405b&color2=6b8ab6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-59728725308751938602008-05-18T16:49:00.003-04:002008-05-18T16:55:21.204-04:00Oakland Democrats and Gary Peters in Birmingham<span style="font-size:130%;">Oakland County Democrats were out in force on Sunday in Birmingham's 75th Anniversary parade. Democrats Sheila White Smith, candidate for County Clerk, Gary Peters, candidate for the 9th Congressional District and Jane Boudreau, candidate for Oakland County Sheriff joined the troops as we marched through downtown Birmingham. </span><br /><span style="font-size:130%;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"></span></span><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SDCWwwiaSoI/AAAAAAAAAmk/-wYHvF4Y2zI/s1600-h/Democratic+candidates.JPG"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SDCWwwiaSoI/AAAAAAAAAmk/-wYHvF4Y2zI/s400/Democratic+candidates.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5201823334020041346" border="0" /></a><span style="font-size:130%;">Joe Knollenberg wasn't quite so popular. We found Joe's thundersticks in the trash outside the Townsend hotel and there were lots more in trash cans all over downtown Birmingham. </span><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SDCW6AiaSpI/AAAAAAAAAms/bVULuYjtlXI/s1600-h/Knollenberg+in+the+trash+2.JPG"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SDCW6AiaSpI/AAAAAAAAAms/bVULuYjtlXI/s400/Knollenberg+in+the+trash+2.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5201823492933831314" border="0" /></a>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-53741132517242736952008-05-17T21:52:00.002-04:002008-05-17T21:56:31.012-04:00I Wonder if Joe Knollenberg's Jewish Supporters Will Tell Joe to Denounce Hagee and McCain After Hearing This<span style="font-size:130%;"><a href="http://www.talk2action.org/story/2008/5/15/141520/281">Audio Recording of McCain's Political Endorser John Hagee Preaching Jews Are Cursed and Subhuman</a><br />By Bruce Wilson Thu May 15, 2008 at 02:15:20 PM EST printable version print story<br />Review it on NewsTrust<br />Yesterday I discovered an astonishing audio recording of a sermon, by controversial McCain endorser Pastor John Hagee, in which Hagee elaborates on his view that Hitler and the Nazis were divine agents sent by God to (with gruesome inefficiency it would seem) chase Europe's Jews towards Palestine. In his 2006 book "Jerusalem Countdown", Hagee proposed that anti-Semitism, and thus the Holocaust, was the fault of Jews themselves - the result of an age old divine curse incurred by the ancient Hebrews through worshiping idols and passed, down the ages, to all Jews now alive. In the sermon Hagee also clarifies a point, on his theological views, that has long concerned me. I might have used any number of titles to describe this sermon by Pastor John Hagee, given in the late 1990's and then mass marketed as part of a book Hagee published in 2001 and republished in 2003, "The Battle For Jerusalem".</span><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ErC1IJeHnyc&hl=en"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ErC1IJeHnyc&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-65334593108441089612008-05-17T16:59:00.006-04:002008-05-17T18:02:35.818-04:00How Would You Punish John McBush for Wanting to Talk to Hamas?<span style="font-size:130%;">Joe Knollenberg gave this interview to Fox News regarding Jimmy Carter's visit to talk with the leaders of Hamas, saying we should never negotiate with terrorists. Two years ago, John McBush said that we should talk to Hamas because they were now the elected government. </span><br /><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/48tflW8vXq4&hl=en"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/48tflW8vXq4&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object><br /><span style="font-size:130%;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Here's John McBush's Interview from two years ago on talking to Hamas</span></span><br /><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/icooZ4PTM60"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/icooZ4PTM60" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-91655252072762235412008-05-17T09:17:00.002-04:002008-05-17T09:20:10.466-04:00Joe, Come Take the Bush/McCain Challenge May 24 in Downtown Rochester<span style="font-size:130%;">This is a challenge to all Joe Knollenberg supporters and to you too, Joe. Come to the Farmer's Market in downtown Rochester next Saturday, May 24 and see if you can tell the difference between John McCain and George Bush. You may be surprised at the results. We'll be set up just outside the entrance.<br /><br /></span><br /><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sbBEQN9Hb8Y"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sbBEQN9Hb8Y" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-18289510266491783472008-05-17T04:41:00.010-04:002008-05-17T05:01:41.211-04:00John McCain's Budget May Cause Knollenberg and Republicans to choke on deficits<span style="font-size:130%;">Is this the kind of "fiscal responsibility" Republicans and Joe Knollenberg want to associate themselves with? Republicans talk about cutting taxes from now until kingdom come, but they fail to reflect on what those tax cuts mean to the American landscape. I guess they just want to keep borrowing money from the Chinese to pay for the massive deficits spending. More tax and borrow from Republican, John McBush.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:130%;" ><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/05/15/mccain-deficit/">McCain’s Budget Would Create Largest Deficit In 25 Years, Largest Debt Since WWII</a></span><br /><br />Sen. John McCain <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20080418/pl_bloomberg/a72l7_aj5p9c">promises</a> that, as president, he would “cut taxes and balance the budget.” But his current economic plan would create deficits as deep as 5.7% of GDP by the end of a two term presidency — the highest federal budget deficit in 25 years — and would accumulate the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2009/pdf/hist.pdf">biggest debt</a> since the second World War, according to a <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/budget.pdf">new analysis</a> by the Center for American Progress Action Fund. McCain’s current fiscal plan would recklessly exacerbate the fiscal irresponsibility of the Bush Administration further by gutting revenues far below the average level of the past 25 years.<br /><br />For the past 25 years, deficits have <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/budget.pdf">never been more severe</a> than 5% of GDP, with <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/89xx/doc8917/01-23-2008_BudgetOutlook.pdf">surpluses</a> as high as 2.4% of GDP in the year 2000. Under McCain, yearly deficits would increase sharply, beginning with $505 billion in FY2009 (3.4% of GDP) and skyrocket to $1.2 trillion (5.7% of GDP) by FY2017. In 2018 these deficits would reach 6% of GDP, tied with the largest deficits since WW2 in 1983. Current Bush policies <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/budget.pdf">would keep the defici</a>t in 2017 to $660 billion (3.1% of GDP).<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SC6a4wiaSlI/AAAAAAAAAmM/qWtwnqJAOeo/s1600-h/mccain_budget3_web1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SC6a4wiaSlI/AAAAAAAAAmM/qWtwnqJAOeo/s400/mccain_budget3_web1.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5201264919552084562" border="0" /></a>According to the study, McCain’s economic plan, (which includes a corporate tax cut, a full repeal of the AMT, and an extension of the Bush tax cuts) would leave a debt of $12.7 trillion (the highest <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2009/pdf/hist.pdf">since 1951</a> when America was still holding debt from WW2) by the last budget of a two term presidency starting in 2009 (FY2017). This debt is $3.5 trillion more severe than the one resulting from an extension of current Bush policy, which would leave a debt of $9.2 trillion (43% of projected GDP).<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SC6bOAiaSmI/AAAAAAAAAmU/ihWrkEdBIds/s1600-h/mccain_budget_web.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SC6bOAiaSmI/AAAAAAAAAmU/ihWrkEdBIds/s400/mccain_budget_web.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5201265284624304738" border="0" /></a>McCain would slash government revenues, which have averaged 18.3% of GDP for the past 25 years, to their lowest levels since before 1962. Revenues would average only 16.3 percent of GDP for the duration of his two terms. Under current Bush policy, revenues would remain above 18 percent of GDP.<br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SC6bZgiaSnI/AAAAAAAAAmc/ThHoBAu1Qrg/s1600-h/mccain_budget2_web.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SC6bZgiaSnI/AAAAAAAAAmc/ThHoBAu1Qrg/s400/mccain_budget2_web.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5201265482192800370" border="0" /></a><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/budget.pdf">This analysis</a> currently incorporates the most generous possible savings McCain has offered thus far: an $18 billion cut of wasteful earmarks and a $15 billion “freeze” in wasteful spending, with the savings grown at the rate of GDP growth over his presidency. These “savings,” which come no where near paying for his reckless tax cuts, already include “<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/budget.pdf">heavy cuts</a> in after-school programs, student aid, public broadcasting, and job training.” To fill the gaping remaining hole, McCain supporters have suggested policies that would lead to “<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/05/06/one-two-punch/">massive cuts</a>” in Social Security.<br /><br /><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/budget.pdf">Read the full report</a>.Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-67932967489660620162008-05-16T05:36:00.003-04:002008-05-16T05:48:12.539-04:00Will Joe Knollenberg call for cutting off public funds to McCain's campaign?<span style="font-size:130%;">Our good friend John McCain has done another flip-flop on the American public. Two years ago, in an interview he called for negotiating with Hamas. Joe Knollenberg has called for cutting off funding for The Carter Center recently because of Carter's visit to the Middle East and talking to Hamas. So, it seems to me, Knollenberg, with the revealing of this interview, should call for the cutoff of all public funding for John McCain's campaign, and since McCain has violated his own campaign finance law, by using his public funding as collateral for a loan, urge the bank where the loan was obtained to call in the loan of $4 million.<br /><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/icooZ4PTM60"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/icooZ4PTM60" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br /></span><blockquote>Two years ago, in an interview with James Rubin for Sky News, Sen. John McCain expressed a willingness to negotiate with the terrorist group Hamas -- the very group that McCain has been <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/18/mccain-hamas-endorsement_n_97469.html">relentlessly</a> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/15/john-mccain-obama-unfit-t_n_101994.html">using</a> to smear Sen. Barack Obama over the last several weeks. <p> </p><p> Rubin has written an <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/15/AR2008051503306.html?hpid=opinionsbox1">op-ed</a> in Friday's Washington Post about his exchange with McCain, and The Huffington Post has obtained exclusive video. Here's the key excerpt: </p><p> </p><blockquote>RUBIN: "Do you think that American diplomats should be operating the way they have in the past, working with the Palestinian government if Hamas is now in charge?" <p> </p><p>McCAIN: "They're the government; sooner or later we are going to have to deal with them, one way or another, and I understand why this administration and previous administrations had such antipathy towards Hamas because of their dedication to violence and the things that they not only espouse but practice, so . . . but it's a new reality in the Middle East. I think the lesson is people want security and a decent life and decent future, that they want democracy. Fatah was not giving them that."</p><p> As Rubin <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/15/AR2008051503306.html?hpid=opinionsbox1">adds</a>: </p><blockquote>Given that exchange, the new John McCain might say that Hamas should be rooting for the old John McCain to win the presidential election. The old John McCain, it appears, was ready to do business with a Hamas-led government, while both Clinton and Obama have said that Hamas must change its policies toward Israel and terrorism before it can have diplomatic relations with the United States. <p> </p><p>Even if McCain had not favored doing business with Hamas two years ago, he had no business smearing Barack Obama. But given his stated position then, it is either the height of hypocrisy or a case of political amnesia for McCain to inject Hamas into the American election. </p></blockquote><p> </p></blockquote></blockquote>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-51201431452963856582008-05-16T05:23:00.004-04:002008-05-16T05:36:41.798-04:00Lansing State Journal Rates Peters/Knollenberg Race Tossup from Lean Incumbent<span style="font-size:130%;">This is the first time that the Peters/Knollenberg race has been rated a tossup, a change from leaning incumbent. Go Gary!<a href="http://noise.typepad.com/election_countdown/2008/05/updated-congres.html"> CLICK HERE</a> for the rest of the story.<br /></span><p><strong></strong></p><blockquote><p><strong>Toss-up</strong></p> <ul><li>Joe Knollenberg (R), 9th District. Former State Sen. Gary Peters is a viable candidate and all the momentum is against the GOP. While few seem to be enthusiastic Peters fanatics, he's been powerful enough to clear what was to be a competitive primary field. In another year, Knollenberg might be safe, but national trends are against him. (Formerly Lean Incumbent)</li></ul></blockquote><ul><li><br /></li></ul>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-34336867288688073452008-05-14T09:58:00.005-04:002008-05-14T11:58:37.832-04:00How Will Joe Knollenberg Defend John McBush on this one?<span style="font-size:130%;">Wow, the Michigan Republican Party and Joe Knollenberg really screwed up this time. Guess who dead set against the Boeing tanker? You guessed it. John McBush. And there's video. These were good paying, union jobs and John McBush and by extension, Joe Knollenberg, wanted the $40 Billion contract go to European manufacturer, Airbus. Now if this isn't a national security and economic issue for the American people, I don't know what is. Joe Knollenberg is alway saying how he wants to help American manufacturing companies, namely the American auto manufacturers. This decision by John McBush flies in the face of Joe Knollenberg's presumed allegiance to American manufacturers. <a href="http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/000962.htm"> CLICK HERE</a> to read about how John McBush screwed American workers.<br /><br />Now will Joe Knollenberg denounce and separate himself from John McBush? Let's see..</span><br /><br /><span style="font-size:130%;">The quote below is from the Michigan Republican Party's daily newsletter from Saul Anuzis, the May 14 edition.</span><br /><blockquote>BOEING…THE TANKER DECISION…MAKE IT AMERICAN MADE…America’s military deserves the best tanker for the mission and America’s taxpayers deserve the most value for their money. It’s crazy for us to give this contract to the Europeans, when America needs the jobs and America needs to defend itself.</blockquote><br /><br />Here's the video of John McBush saying how he saved the taxpayers $2 billion by nixing the deal going to Boeing. He also nixed 40,000 good paying American jobs.<br /><br /><br /><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1BMbObIXUu8&hl=en"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1BMbObIXUu8&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object><br /><div style="text-align: center;">This video is Lou Dobbs expressing his outrage that the deal went to Airbus.<br /></div><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MVLNu3BTviI&hl=en"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MVLNu3BTviI&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-89154396215548222432008-05-14T06:09:00.002-04:002008-05-14T06:12:18.975-04:00Another Reason for Joe Knollenberg to Repudiate John McCain<span style="font-size:130%;">It's not widely known, but Joe Knollenberg has a gay son, Stephen. He has a successful interior design company. Joe actually voted against the Federal Marriage Amendment. but you'd think that Joe would have a problem with the presidential candidate he's endorsed, John McCain for his opposition to gay marriage. <br /><br />This video shows John McCain appearing in a commercial in support of Arizona's ban on gay marriage.<br /></span><br /><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/j7DHscURg3E&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/j7DHscURg3E&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-75814495583351286772008-05-14T05:47:00.002-04:002008-05-14T05:52:32.890-04:00No Republican is safe. Democrats go 3-3 in Special Elections<span style="font-size:130%;">In the biggest Democratic pickup so far, Democrats prove that no Republican, even 8-term incumbents like Joe Knollenberg are safe. The country is demanding change and Gary Peters will be part of the Democratic wave that is sweeping over America.<br /></span><blockquote> Childers victory gives Dems a third straight takeover<table class="contentpaneopen"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2" valign="top">Childers, who beat Davis 49-46 three weeks ago but came up just shy of a race-ending majority, joins new Democratic Reps. Bill Foster (Ill.) and Don Cazayoux (La.) to give Democrats a trifecta of upsets in conservative House districts over the last two months. <p class="MsoNoSpacing">The loss could send shockwaves through the Republican Party, where murmurs about a leadership shakeup have become more and more audible.</p> <p class="MsoNoSpacing">Democrats are backing up the assertion that they remain on the offensive in the cycle following a 30-seat gain, which has historically not been the case after a “wave” election.</p></td></tr></tbody></table></blockquote><table class="contentpaneopen"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2" valign="top"><p class="MsoNoSpacing"></p></td></tr></tbody></table><br /><table class="contentpaneopen"><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" align="left" valign="top" width="70%"><br /></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" class="createdate" valign="top"><br /></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top"><br /></td></tr></tbody></table>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-78230906576148064432008-05-14T05:05:00.002-04:002008-05-14T05:17:33.644-04:00McCain Endorser, Hagee, Apologizes. McCain Accepts Apology<span style="font-size:130%;">This story appeared in the Oakland Press on page A-11. No front page for John McCain's endorser and crazy Reverend. The corporate media continues to give McCain a pass. And not one word from Joe Knollenberg.</span><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SCqtbwiaSiI/AAAAAAAAAl0/j-cRRv6-DVA/s1600-h/hagee.bmp"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SCqtbwiaSiI/AAAAAAAAAl0/j-cRRv6-DVA/s400/hagee.bmp" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5200159412149963298" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-size:130%;">And that's that? After all the grief Reverend Wright's comments gave Barack Obama the corporate media is, for the most part, giving Teflon John McCain a pass on John Hagee and Rod Parsley.<br /><br />Since Joe is a good Catholic boy, you'd think he'd more outraged about McCain accepting Hagee's endorsement. I guess saying things about his religion only matter if they come from a liberal activist. That's what I thought.<br /></span><br /><span style="font-size:130%;">As a Catholic, you would think that Joe Knollenberg would be at least as incensed with John McCain over accepting the endorsement of John Hagee as he is with Jimmy Carter for meeting with Hamas. But we haven't heard a word from Knollenberg over McCain's relationship with Reverend John Hagee. With all the attention being given to Reverend Wright, you would think the media and Joe Knollenberg would pay the same amount of attention to John Hagee and Rod Parsley another television preacher with radical views. <a style="color: rgb(51, 102, 255);" href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6097362">CLICK HERE</a> to listen to John Hagee's interview with Terri Gross on NPR from Sept. 18, 2006.<br /></span><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SCVanSiZE7I/AAAAAAAAAlc/NBs_4q_isMw/s1600-h/Bill+Press+John+Hagee.bmp"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SCVanSiZE7I/AAAAAAAAAlc/NBs_4q_isMw/s400/Bill+Press+John+Hagee.bmp" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5198660975906591666" border="0" /></a><br /><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Video of John Hagee speaking about Catholicism and more</span><br /></div><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4qNi7tPanUA&hl=en"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4qNi7tPanUA&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object><br /><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">John McCain's Other Problem, Rod Parsley. </span><br /></div><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WXZbIGJrDkg&hl=en"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WXZbIGJrDkg&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-56773273701118680152008-05-11T06:26:00.003-04:002008-05-11T06:31:50.150-04:00Eccentric Letter from Republican Gets It Wrong<span style="font-size:130%;">This letter from a Republican tries again to tie me to MoveOn.org and even tries to trot out the idea that my activities are "well-funded" by MoveOn. So, just to set the record straight, I am a member of MoveOn. However they have not given me one penny. I have no connection to MoveOn other than being on their mailing list and I have hosted several of their events at my home and at Joe Knollenberg's office. <br /><br />These Republican attacks are so ridiculous they border on the insane. But what is one to expect from the party of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, John McCain and Karl Rove? Dirty tricks, unfounded attacks, torture, warrantless wiretapping, endless war in Iraq. If you aren't outraged, then you aren't paying attention.<br /><br /></span><p></p><blockquote><p>A bumpy ride</p><p>Your opinion page of April 17 has another letter from Bruce Fealk bad-mouthing Rep. Knollenberg. It is reported that he is well-funded by MoveOn.org, which is backed by George Soros, not exactly friendly to America.</p><p>Its goal is to target Knollenberg and others who don't agree with its ultra-liberal biased agenda. So we know what to expect from here to election and as expressed by Bette Davis in one of her movies: "Button your seat belt. We're in for a bumpy ride."</p><p>Julius A. Becker</p></blockquote><p></p>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-79660579796074317202008-05-11T05:55:00.002-04:002008-05-11T05:56:13.684-04:00Fealk Wins Progressive Activist of the Year Award<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SCbB6wiaSgI/AAAAAAAAAlk/gzhowVp7kQg/s1600-h/Hightower+Award.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SCbB6wiaSgI/AAAAAAAAAlk/gzhowVp7kQg/s400/Hightower+Award.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5199056035051620866" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-size:130%;">Yesterday at the Michigan Progress Summit in Lansing, Christine Barry and Jim Hightower presented me with the first annual Progressive Activist of the Year Award. I'm honored to be the first recipient of this award. The award was created by <a href="http://www.bloggingformichigan.com">Blogging for Michigan.</a><br /></span><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SCbCGQiaShI/AAAAAAAAAls/nIyTmWu9upI/s1600-h/Activist+award.bmp"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SCbCGQiaShI/AAAAAAAAAls/nIyTmWu9upI/s400/Activist+award.bmp" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5199056232620116498" border="0" /></a>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-27354713210054440032008-05-10T04:16:00.006-04:002008-05-10T05:03:34.359-04:00Will Knollenberg call on McCain to Denounce Hagee and Parsley?<span style="font-size:130%;">As a Catholic, you would think that Joe Knollenberg would be at least as incensed with John McCain over accepting the endorsement of John Hagee as he is with Jimmy Carter for meeting with Hamas. But we haven't heard a word from Knollenberg over McCain's relationship with Reverend John Hagee. With all the attention being given to Reverend Wright, you would think the media and Joe Knollenberg would pay the same amount of attention to John Hagee and Rod Parsley another television preacher with radical views. Today's Oakland Press carries an editorial of Bill Press and Hagee's statements regarding Catholics, gays and more. <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6097362">CLICK HERE</a> to listen to John Hagee's interview with Terri Gross on NPR from Sept. 18, 2006.<br /></span><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SCVanSiZE7I/AAAAAAAAAlc/NBs_4q_isMw/s1600-h/Bill+Press+John+Hagee.bmp"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_spSlD167xvk/SCVanSiZE7I/AAAAAAAAAlc/NBs_4q_isMw/s400/Bill+Press+John+Hagee.bmp" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5198660975906591666" border="0" /></a><br /><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Video of John Hagee speaking about Catholicism and more</span><br /></div><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4qNi7tPanUA&hl=en"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4qNi7tPanUA&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object><br /><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">John McCain's Other Problem, Rod Parsley. </span><br /></div><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WXZbIGJrDkg&hl=en"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WXZbIGJrDkg&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-89508304415346493702008-05-09T21:24:00.002-04:002008-05-09T21:26:45.545-04:00Joe flip-flops on Mother's Day<span style="font-size:130%;">Today there was a vote on a resolution recognizing Mother's Day. The first vote was 412-0. Then the story gets interesting. Unbelievably, Joe Knollenberg actually then voted against Mother's Day when a vote to reconsider the resolution was called. Joe and 177 other Republicans actually flip-flopped on a vote recognizing Mother's Day. <br /></span><span style="font-size:+2;"><b></b></span><blockquote><span style="font-size:85%;"><b>Republicans Vote Against Moms; No Word Yet on Puppies, Kittens</b></span><br /><p><span style="font-size:-1;">By Dana Milbank<br />Friday, May 9, 2008; A03<br /></span></p><p>It was already shaping up to be a difficult year for congressional Republicans. Now, on the cusp of Mother's Day, comes this: A majority of the House <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/U.S.+Republican+Party?tid=informline" target="">GOP</a> has voted against motherhood.</p><p>On Wednesday afternoon, the House had just voted, 412 to 0, to pass H. Res. 1113, "Celebrating the role of mothers in the United States and supporting the goals and ideals of Mother's Day," when Rep. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Todd+Tiahrt?tid=informline" target="">Todd Tiahrt</a> (R-Kan.), rose in protest.</p><p>"Mr. Speaker, I move to reconsider the vote," he announced.</p><p>Rep. Kathy Castor (D-Fla.), who has two young daughters, moved to table Tiahrt's request, setting up a revote. This time, 178 Republicans cast their votes against mothers.</p><p>It has long been the custom to compare a popular piece of legislation to motherhood and apple pie. Evidently, that is no longer the standard. Worse, Republicans are now confronted with a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/John+Kerry?tid=informline" target="">John Kerry</a>-esque predicament: They actually voted for motherhood before they voted against it.</p><p>Republicans, unhappy with the Democratic majority, have been using such procedural tactics as this all week to bring the House to a standstill, but the assault on mothers may have gone too far. House Minority Leader <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/John+Boehner?tid=informline" target="">John Boehner</a>, asked yesterday to explain why he and 177 of his colleagues switched their votes, answered: "Oh, we just wanted to make sure that everyone was on record in support of Mother's Day."</p><p>By voting against it</p></blockquote><p>?</p>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-2304935260909286252008-05-09T04:35:00.003-04:002008-05-09T04:36:40.557-04:00Eric B at MichLib reports Cook Report moves MI-09 from Likely Republican to Leaning Republican<p><span style="font-size:130%;">This report in from Eric B. at Michigan Liberal. </span><br /></p><blockquote><p>The <a href="http://www.cookpolitical.com/">Cook Political Report</a> moves Michigan's two biggest races in favor of the two Democrats. The 7th District goes from "Lean Republican" to "Toss up," and the 9th goes from "Likely Republican" to "Lean Republican."</p><p>For Mark Schauer, this means the second bit of ratification in the last couple of days. It was Roll Call who most lately called the race a toss up. Without mentioning anything, this really represents a Schauer advantage, since it means moving things in his direction.</p><p>As such could be said for Gary Peters, challenging Joe Knollenberg in the 9th. The remarkable thing in the 9th is that Knollenberg enjoys a fund raising advantage over his opponent.</p><p>You can show Peters a little extra love tomorrow by showing up between noon and 1:30 p.m. to meet Peters in a live chat with MichLib's readers. </p></blockquote><p><br /></p>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-26277690023687890622008-05-08T07:56:00.002-04:002008-05-08T08:09:28.981-04:00Knollenberg Touts Personal Responsibility But Not Corporate Responsibility<span style="font-size:130%;">An article in today's Eccentric is about how Joe Knollenberg wants to help the American auto manufacturers. It's interesting, at the legislative update meeting in Rochester a few weeks ago, when talking about health care, Knollenberg talked a lot about personal responsibility in regard to taking care of one's own health. But when it comes to the auto companies taking responsibility for their corporate health, Knollenberg takes a position 180 degrees from his theme of personal responsibility. The auto companies, even though the oil crisis could be seen a hundred miles down the road, continued to build low mileage SUV's and trucks. Why? One word, GREED. They make higher profits off SUV's and trucks than they do smaller, fuel efficient vehicles.<br /><br />But does Joe Knollenberg ask for corporate responsibility for the troubles of the auto industry and tell the auto manufacturers, let them eat cake? No. Does he want to hold the auto industry responsible for increasing fuel economy? No.<br /><br />Apparently Knollenberg is at odds with John McCain on this issue also. McCain does want to raise CAFE standards, as he told the Eccentric.<br /><br />Knollenbeg can't have it both ways, by being in favor of free trade that ships good paying American jobs overseas and then turning around and saying we have to help the auto industry by offering them money to save American jobs. That's not leadership. That's pandering to Joe's auto industry campaign contributors.</span><span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" class="bodytext"><p>"He said he believes in free trade and making the auto industry raise fuel-economy standards. He said the state's auto industry "is not finished."</p><p> "Of course the old kind of doing business is not coming back. ... We've got to retrain and educate workers" to take advantage of the new economy, he said. He believes the Big 3 have leveled the playing field through recent contract negotiations."</p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="headline"></span></p><blockquote><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="headline">Knollenberg aims to aid auto industry</span><br /> <br /> <span class="bodytext"> <p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> by Greg Kowalski</p><p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> ECCENTRIC STAFF WRITER</p><p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">The embattled auto industry would get a helping hand with new legislation being proposed by Congressman Joe Knollenberg. </p><p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> Speaking at the Automation Alley offices Tuesday in Troy, the Bloomfield Township Republican - who is embroiled in a hotly contested re-election bid against Democrat Gary Peters - unveiled a plan to stimulate the economy and "help the Big Three compete."</p><p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> "This will be a huge shot in the arm to grow our Michigan economy," Knollenberg said.</p><p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> The proposed legislation would broaden the availability of research and development tax credits for companies; provide support for research in advanced batteries; create two hydrogen fuel pilot programs; require the EPA to streamline protocols and regulations on biodiesel fuel; and establish an inter-agency federal task force on CAFE standards.</p><p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> CAFE - the Corporate Average Fuel Economy - standard sets how many miles per gallon a vehicle gets. The standards, 35 miles per gallon by 2020, could cost the automakers $85 billion to achieve and add thousands of dollars to the price of a car, Knollenberg said.</p><p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> "The entire auto industry will make tremendous investments in technology (with the proposed legislation)," said Robert Babik, director of Emissions, Environment and Energy for General Motors.</p><p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> He spoke in favor of the legislation, as did Fred Hoffman, director of Government Relations for Chrysler, and Charlie Pryde, director of Government Relations for Ford.</p><p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> Although the Big Three are competitors, "I don't think there is an inch of space between us in support of the legislations," Hoffman said.</p><p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> The legislation "will provide critical help to the auto industry," Pryde said.</p><p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> Oakland County Executive L. Brooks Patterson said the legislation was a perfect match for the focus of Automation Alley, which is a hub of industry research and development.</p><p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> "It's good for Michigan and good for the global economy," Patterson said.</p><p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> Whether it, or at least parts of it, is enacted into law remains to be seen.</p><p style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> On the heels of the announcement, Peters issued a statement blasting Knollenberg.</p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> "Real leadership means not waiting for a crisis to take action," said Peters. "I'm going to go to Washington and I'm going to start fighting for Michigan families and Michigan jobs on day one. I'm going to stop giving tax breaks to companies that ship jobs overseas and stop giving billions in subsidies to big oil companies who are raking in record profits."</span></p></span></blockquote><span class="bodytext"><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"></span> </p></span><p></p></span><br /><span style="font-size:130%;"><br /><br /></span>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-68696627953139231612008-05-04T04:33:00.004-04:002008-05-04T04:45:57.184-04:00Democrat Takes Seat from 20-year Incumbent in Louisiana. Look Out Joe<span style="font-size:130%;">Boy, is Joe Knollenberg in trouble. Last night it was reported that the Democrats took back a seat in Louisiana that has been Republican since 1974. Joe only won by about 5% in 2006. Change is in the air Joe, and Democrats are taking back the 9th Congressional District of Michigan.<br /></span><blockquote> Dems add to majority with Cazayoux win in La. <table class="contentpaneopen"><tbody><tr> <td colspan="2" align="left" valign="top" width="70%"> <span class="contentauthor"> By J. Taylor Rushing </span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" class="createdate" valign="top"> Posted: 05/03/08 11:17 PM [ET] </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" valign="top"> House Democrats continued to expand their majority Saturday night after Louisiana state Rep. Don Cazayoux emerged victorious in a special election for retired Rep. Richard Baker’s (R) district. <p class="MsoNoSpacing"> </p>The win comes two months after Democrats picked up their first seat of the year. In March, Democrat Bill Foster won the Illinois seat of former House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R). That seat, like the Louisiana contest, was in solidly Republican areas. President Bush carried the Illinois district with 55 percent and the Louisiana district with 59 percent in 2004. <p class="MsoNoSpacing">Cazayoux benefited from a strong fundraising advantage over Woody Jenkins — $810,000 to $490,000 — with much of the help coming from national Democrats. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) spent $920,000 on the contest.</p> <p class="MsoNoSpacing">The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) only spent $440,000 on the race and Jenkins received less than $40,000 from GOP members.</p></td></tr></tbody></table><br /></blockquote>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20091110.post-59273981527166374262008-05-03T23:40:00.002-04:002008-05-03T23:42:28.841-04:00Guess What, Joe? You and George W. Bush are Terrorists<span style="font-size:130%;">This is a brilliantly simple video. This guy lays it on the line and give what I believe to be the real definition of terrorists and it's not the people that flew planes into the World Trade Towers on 9/11. No, it's the people in the White House and the Joe Knollenbergs and the other Republicons in Congress that have really done this country in.<br /><br /><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Cyt2BJAqycU&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Cyt2BJAqycU&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br /></span>Bruce Fealkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15134820420899225811noreply@blogger.com